#ANTI ALIASING FILTER FULL#

How important is that filter to obtaining sharp images and why is the filter left out of the higher end cameras? Btw.: that for me was the biggest let-down of the D810 compared to the D800.' This is not a final qualified observation but IвЂ™ll keep an eye on this topic because moire can easily be seen without pixel-peeping and is hard/impossible to remove in post-processing. But in my first tests with the ultra-sharp Sigma 135/1.8 Art and my standard test-target I thought that moire was reduced compared to the D810. Both cameras have no anti-aliasing filter so thereвЂ™s certainly not the huge difference like between the D800 with AA-filter and the D810. The other thing that could have changed from the D810 is moire. But that is only when youвЂ™re pixel-peeping. Stopping down beyond this could make images softer due to diffraction. While the optimal aperture on the D810 (and D800) was f/7.1 it could now be f6.3. 'The other consequence of the smaller photo-sites might be a slightly stronger effect from diffraction. Only those wishing to brag and spend money on the brag obsess over the AA filter issue.Дў1st November 2017 Written by Gordon Laing Real world looking at photos by real world people do not see any difference. The human eye does not see at a pixel level. At normal human distance of viewing there is NO difference especially when printed. They eliminate the AA filter on cameras that have higher pixel density.ДЄ person again cannot tell the difference if it has it or not unless they pixel peep.

#ANTI ALIASING FILTER FULL#

The top and most expensive pro cameras like the Nikon D5 and Canon 1DX Mk.II have an anti-aliasing filter because they only have 21 megapixels on a full frame sensor.

Anti aliasing filter